Crème de Normandie vs Nata para cocinar
Overall, Nata para cocinar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Crème de Normandie | Nata para cocinar |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 294 kcal | 164 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 20.1 g | 9.7 g |
| Sugars | 3.5 g | 3.9 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 2.4 g | 2.8 g |
| Additives | 1 | 3 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nata para cocinar has 44% fewer calories (164 kcal vs 294 kcal).
- Nata para cocinar has 50% less fat (15 g vs 30 g).
- Nata para cocinar has 52% less saturated fat (9.7 g vs 20.1 g).
- Crème de Normandie has 10% less sugar (3.5 g vs 3.9 g).
- Nata para cocinar has 14% more protein (2.8 g vs 2.4 g).
Ingredients
Crème de Normandie
Crème de lait*, stabilisant: pectine. *Issue de l'agriculture Biologique et du commerce équitable
Nata para cocinar
cow's cream (15% fat), modified starch, emulsifiers (lactic esters of monoglycerides and diglycerides of fatty acids, monoglycerides and diglycerides of fatty acids), stabilizer (carrageenans)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Crème de Normandie or Nata para cocinar?
Overall, Nata para cocinar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nata para cocinar has fewer calories: 164 kcal versus 294 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Crème de Normandie has less sugar: 3.5 g versus 3.9 g per 100 g.