Comparison
Raison vs Nestea forest fruits
Overall, Nestea forest fruits has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Raison | Nestea forest fruits |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 34 kcal | 19 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 8.4 g | 4.5 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nestea forest fruits has 44% fewer calories (19 kcal vs 34 kcal).
- Raison has no fat, while Nestea forest fruits has 0.5 g.
- Nestea forest fruits has 46% less sugar (4.5 g vs 8.4 g).
- Nestea forest fruits has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Raison
Not available.
Nestea forest fruits
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Raison or Nestea forest fruits?
Overall, Nestea forest fruits has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nestea forest fruits has fewer calories: 19 kcal versus 34 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nestea forest fruits has less sugar: 4.5 g versus 8.4 g per 100 g.