Nestea forest fruits vs Suc de portocale, grapefruit roz și fructul dragonului
Overall, Nestea forest fruits has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nestea forest fruits
Suc de portocale, grapefruit roz și fructul dragonului
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Nestea forest fruits | Suc de portocale, grapefruit... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 19 kcal | 41 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 4.5 g | 8.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nestea forest fruits has 54% fewer calories (19 kcal vs 41 kcal).
- Suc de portocale, grapefruit roz și fructul dragonului has no fat, while Nestea forest fruits has 0.5 g.
- Nestea forest fruits has 48% less sugar (4.5 g vs 8.7 g).
- Suc de portocale, grapefruit roz și fructul dragonului has 100% more fiber (0.3 g vs 0 g).
- Nestea forest fruits has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Nestea forest fruits
Not available.
Suc de portocale, grapefruit roz și fructul dragonului
70% suc de portocale, 25% suc de grapefruit roz, 5% piure de fructul dragonului roz.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Nestea forest fruits or Suc de portocale, grapefruit roz și fructul dragonului?
Overall, Nestea forest fruits has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nestea forest fruits has fewer calories: 19 kcal versus 41 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nestea forest fruits has less sugar: 4.5 g versus 8.7 g per 100 g.