Comparison

Nestea forest fruits vs Suc de portocale, grapefruit roz și fructul dragonului

Overall, Nestea forest fruits has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientNestea forest fruitsSuc de portocale, grapefruit...
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group — —
Calories 19 kcal 41 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 4.5 g 8.7 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g 0.3 g
Protein 0.5 g 0.7 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Nestea forest fruits has 54% fewer calories (19 kcal vs 41 kcal).
  • Suc de portocale, grapefruit roz și fructul dragonului has no fat, while Nestea forest fruits has 0.5 g.
  • Nestea forest fruits has 48% less sugar (4.5 g vs 8.7 g).
  • Suc de portocale, grapefruit roz și fructul dragonului has 100% more fiber (0.3 g vs 0 g).
  • Nestea forest fruits has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Nestea forest fruits

Not available.

Suc de portocale, grapefruit roz și fructul dragonului

70% suc de portocale, 25% suc de grapefruit roz, 5% piure de fructul dragonului roz.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Nestea forest fruits or Suc de portocale, grapefruit roz și fructul dragonului?

Overall, Nestea forest fruits has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Nestea forest fruits has fewer calories: 19 kcal versus 41 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Nestea forest fruits has less sugar: 4.5 g versus 8.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons