Comparison

Radler vs Cerveza Amstel Radler

Overall, Cerveza Amstel Radler has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRadlerCerveza Amstel Radler
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 37 kcal 35 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 6.6 g 4.7 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 0.5 g 0 g
Additives10
AllergensGlutenGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Cerveza Amstel Radler has 29% less sugar (4.7 g vs 6.6 g).
  • Radler has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Cerveza Amstel Radler is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Radler

Acqua, zucchero, succo di limone da concentrato 3%, malto d'orzo, orzo per birra, succo di limone, concentrato di arance, aromi, stabilizzante (farina di semi di carrube), anidride carbonica, antiossidante-acido ascorbico, luppolo. La presenza di succhi può causare la comparsa di sedimenti naturall. La velatura à una caratteristica naturale del prodotto.

Cerveza Amstel Radler

Agua, 40% cerveza Amstel (agua, malta de cebada y extracto de lúpulo), azúcar, zumos de limón (2.9%), naranja, lima y acerola a partir de concentrados, extracto de limón concentrado, aroma cítrico natural con otros aromas y estabilizante E-410.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Radler or Cerveza Amstel Radler?

Overall, Cerveza Amstel Radler has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cerveza Amstel Radler has fewer calories: 35 kcal versus 37 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Cerveza Amstel Radler has less sugar: 4.7 g versus 6.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons