Grapefruit Radler 0.0 vs Radler
Overall, Grapefruit Radler 0.0 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Grapefruit Radler 0.0 | Radler |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 28 kcal | 37 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 3.5 g | 6.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Grapefruit Radler 0.0 has 24% fewer calories (28 kcal vs 37 kcal).
- Grapefruit Radler 0.0 has 47% less sugar (3.5 g vs 6.6 g).
- Radler has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Grapefruit Radler 0.0
water, gerstemout, suiker, koolzuur, citroensapconcentraat, natuurlijk grapefruitaroma met andere natuurlijke aroma's, 0,6% grapefruitsapconcentraat, lierbessensapconcentraat, gerstemoutextract, hopextract.
Radler
Acqua, zucchero, succo di limone da concentrato 3%, malto d'orzo, orzo per birra, succo di limone, concentrato di arance, aromi, stabilizzante (farina di semi di carrube), anidride carbonica, antiossidante-acido ascorbico, luppolo. La presenza di succhi può causare la comparsa di sedimenti naturall. La velatura à una caratteristica naturale del prodotto.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Grapefruit Radler 0.0 or Radler?
Overall, Grapefruit Radler 0.0 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Grapefruit Radler 0.0 has fewer calories: 28 kcal versus 37 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Grapefruit Radler 0.0 has less sugar: 3.5 g versus 6.6 g per 100 g.