Radler Citroen 0.0 vs Cerveza Amstel Radler
Overall, Cerveza Amstel Radler has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Radler Citroen 0.0 | Cerveza Amstel Radler |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 25 kcal | 35 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 5.7 g | 4.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Radler Citroen 0.0 has 29% fewer calories (25 kcal vs 35 kcal).
- Cerveza Amstel Radler has 18% less sugar (4.7 g vs 5.7 g).
- Cerveza Amstel Radler is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Radler Citroen 0.0
Water, gerstemout, suiker, koolzuur, 0,36% citroensapconcentraat, natuurlijk citroenaroma met andere natuurlijke aroma's, voedingszuur. citroenzuur, stabilisatoren: Arabische gom, johannesbroodpitmeel; hopextract. Gemiddelde
Cerveza Amstel Radler
Agua, 40% cerveza Amstel (agua, malta de cebada y extracto de lúpulo), azúcar, zumos de limón (2.9%), naranja, lima y acerola a partir de concentrados, extracto de limón concentrado, aroma cítrico natural con otros aromas y estabilizante E-410.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Radler Citroen 0.0 or Cerveza Amstel Radler?
Overall, Cerveza Amstel Radler has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Radler Citroen 0.0 has fewer calories: 25 kcal versus 35 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cerveza Amstel Radler has less sugar: 4.7 g versus 5.7 g per 100 g.