Radler vs Radler Himbeere
Overall, Radler Himbeere has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Radler | Radler Himbeere |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 37 kcal | 31 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 6.6 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Radler Himbeere has 16% fewer calories (31 kcal vs 37 kcal).
- Radler has no fat, while Radler Himbeere has 0.5 g.
- Radler Himbeere has 47% less sugar (3.5 g vs 6.6 g).
- Only Radler lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Radler
Acqua, zucchero, succo di limone da concentrato 3%, malto d'orzo, orzo per birra, succo di limone, concentrato di arance, aromi, stabilizzante (farina di semi di carrube), anidride carbonica, antiossidante-acido ascorbico, luppolo. La presenza di succhi può causare la comparsa di sedimenti naturall. La velatura à una caratteristica naturale del prodotto.
Radler Himbeere
Water, barley malt, fructose syrup, hops, CO2, maltodextrin, citric acid (E330), natural aroma, natural black carrot colouring concentrate.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Radler or Radler Himbeere?
Overall, Radler Himbeere has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Radler Himbeere has fewer calories: 31 kcal versus 37 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Radler Himbeere has less sugar: 3.5 g versus 6.6 g per 100 g.