Radler Citroen 0.0 vs Radler
Overall, Radler Citroen 0.0 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Radler Citroen 0.0 | Radler |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 25 kcal | 37 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 5.7 g | 6.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 3 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Radler Citroen 0.0 has 32% fewer calories (25 kcal vs 37 kcal).
- Radler Citroen 0.0 has 14% less sugar (5.7 g vs 6.6 g).
- Radler has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Radler Citroen 0.0
Water, gerstemout, suiker, koolzuur, 0,36% citroensapconcentraat, natuurlijk citroenaroma met andere natuurlijke aroma's, voedingszuur. citroenzuur, stabilisatoren: Arabische gom, johannesbroodpitmeel; hopextract. Gemiddelde
Radler
Acqua, zucchero, succo di limone da concentrato 3%, malto d'orzo, orzo per birra, succo di limone, concentrato di arance, aromi, stabilizzante (farina di semi di carrube), anidride carbonica, antiossidante-acido ascorbico, luppolo. La presenza di succhi può causare la comparsa di sedimenti naturall. La velatura à una caratteristica naturale del prodotto.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Radler Citroen 0.0 or Radler?
Overall, Radler Citroen 0.0 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Radler Citroen 0.0 has fewer calories: 25 kcal versus 37 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Radler Citroen 0.0 has less sugar: 5.7 g versus 6.6 g per 100 g.