Puré de patatas vs Purée de pommes de terre en flocons
Overall, Purée de pommes de terre en flocons has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Puré de patatas
Purée de pommes de terre en flocons
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Puré de patatas | Purée de pommes de terre en... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 167 kcal | 345 kcal |
| Fat | 2.3 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.6 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 5 g | 2.3 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3 g | 7 g |
| Protein | 6 g | 7.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Puré de patatas has 52% fewer calories (167 kcal vs 345 kcal).
- Purée de pommes de terre en flocons has 65% less fat (0.8 g vs 2.3 g).
- Purée de pommes de terre en flocons has 56% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 1.6 g).
- Purée de pommes de terre en flocons has 54% less sugar (2.3 g vs 5 g).
- Purée de pommes de terre en flocons has 57% more fiber (7 g vs 3 g).
- Purée de pommes de terre en flocons has 20% more protein (7.5 g vs 6 g).
- Puré de patatas is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Puré de patatas lists: None.
Ingredients
Puré de patatas
Patatas (99,5%), cúrcuma en polvo.
Purée de pommes de terre en flocons
Pomme de terre 99%, curcuma, antioxydant : extraits de romarin, émulsifiant : mono - et diglycéride d'acides gras (origine végétale)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Puré de patatas or Purée de pommes de terre en flocons?
Overall, Purée de pommes de terre en flocons has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Puré de patatas has fewer calories: 167 kcal versus 345 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Purée de pommes de terre en flocons has less sugar: 2.3 g versus 5 g per 100 g.