Protein+ Cellentani vs Rana passione
Overall, Protein+ Cellentani has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Protein+ Cellentani | Rana passione |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 240 kcal | 229 kcal |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 8.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 3.9 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Fiber | 5 g | 4.5 g |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Protein+ Cellentani has 80% less fat (1.8 g vs 8.9 g).
- Protein+ Cellentani has no saturated fat, while Rana passione has 3.9 g.
- Protein+ Cellentani has 60% less sugar (2 g vs 5 g).
- Protein+ Cellentani has 10% more fiber (5 g vs 4.5 g).
- Protein+ Cellentani has 55% more protein (17.9 g vs 8 g).
- Only Protein+ Cellentani lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Protein+ Cellentani
Semolina (wheat), durum wheat flour, lentil flour, pea protein, chickpea flour, vitamin B3 (niacin), iron (ferrous sulfate), vitamin B1 (thiamine mononitrate), vitamin B2 (riboflavin), folic acid.
Rana passione
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Protein+ Cellentani or Rana passione?
Overall, Protein+ Cellentani has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rana passione has fewer calories: 229 kcal versus 240 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Protein+ Cellentani has less sugar: 2 g versus 5 g per 100 g.