Profeel maustettu raejuusto uuniomena vs Keso ananas/passion
Overall, Profeel maustettu raejuusto uuniomena has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Profeel maustettu raejuusto... | Keso ananas/passion |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 92 kcal | 97 kcal |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 2.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.5 g | 1.8 g |
| Sugars | 5.5 g | 5 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Profeel maustettu raejuusto uuniomena has 14% less fat (2.5 g vs 2.9 g).
- Profeel maustettu raejuusto uuniomena has 17% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 1.8 g).
- Profeel maustettu raejuusto uuniomena has 75% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.8 g).
- Profeel maustettu raejuusto uuniomena has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Profeel maustettu raejuusto uuniomena
Pastöroitu maito ja kerma, omenasose 5%, omenatäysmehutiiviste 5 %, sokeri, muunnettu tärkkelys, suola, kaneli, kardemumma, säilöntäaine (kaliumsorbaatti), hapate ja aromit.
Keso ananas/passion
Raejuusto (pastöroitu maito ja kerma, suola, hapate), ananas 6%, passionhedelmätäysmehu 4,4% (tiivisteestä), viinirypäletäysmehutiiviste, muunnettu perunatärkkelys, happamuudensäätöaine (natriumsitraatti), luontainen aromi, säilöntäaine (kaliumsorbaatti).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Profeel maustettu raejuusto uuniomena or Keso ananas/passion?
Overall, Profeel maustettu raejuusto uuniomena has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Profeel maustettu raejuusto uuniomena has fewer calories: 92 kcal versus 97 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Keso ananas/passion has less sugar: 5 g versus 5.5 g per 100 g.