Comparison

Lakkaraejuusto vs Profeel maustettu raejuusto uuniomena

Overall, Profeel maustettu raejuusto uuniomena has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLakkaraejuustoProfeel maustettu raejuusto...
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 121 kcal 92 kcal
Fat 3.5 g 2.5 g
Saturated fat 2.1 g 1.5 g
Sugars 12 g 5.5 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.2 g
Protein 9.4 g 11 g
Additives22
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Profeel maustettu raejuusto uuniomena has 24% fewer calories (92 kcal vs 121 kcal).
  • Profeel maustettu raejuusto uuniomena has 29% less fat (2.5 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Profeel maustettu raejuusto uuniomena has 29% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Profeel maustettu raejuusto uuniomena has 54% less sugar (5.5 g vs 12 g).
  • Profeel maustettu raejuusto uuniomena has 15% more protein (11 g vs 9.4 g).
  • Profeel maustettu raejuusto uuniomena has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Lakkaraejuusto

Pastöroitu maito ja kerma, sokeri, lakkasose (3,0%), muunnettu maissi - ja perunatärkkelys, suola, säilöntäaine (kaliumsorbaatti), aromit, väri (karotenoidit) ja hapate.

Profeel maustettu raejuusto uuniomena

Pastöroitu maito ja kerma, omenasose 5%, omenatäysmehutiiviste 5 %, sokeri, muunnettu tärkkelys, suola, kaneli, kardemumma, säilöntäaine (kaliumsorbaatti), hapate ja aromit.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Lakkaraejuusto or Profeel maustettu raejuusto uuniomena?

Overall, Profeel maustettu raejuusto uuniomena has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Profeel maustettu raejuusto uuniomena has fewer calories: 92 kcal versus 121 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Profeel maustettu raejuusto uuniomena has less sugar: 5.5 g versus 12 g per 100 g.

More comparisons