Prinzessbohnen vs Rodajas de Piña en su jugo
Overall, Prinzessbohnen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Prinzessbohnen | Rodajas de Piña en su jugo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 32 kcal | 56 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 13 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 1.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Prinzessbohnen has 43% fewer calories (32 kcal vs 56 kcal).
- Prinzessbohnen has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Prinzessbohnen has 93% less sugar (0.9 g vs 13 g).
- Rodajas de Piña en su jugo has 100% more fiber (1 g vs 0 g).
- Prinzessbohnen has 74% more protein (1.9 g vs 0.5 g).
Ingredients
Prinzessbohnen
Not available.
Rodajas de Piña en su jugo
Piña, zumo de piña, (220 g)* corrector de acidez: ácido cítrico. 7% Origen: Filipinas.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Prinzessbohnen or Rodajas de Piña en su jugo?
Overall, Prinzessbohnen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Prinzessbohnen has fewer calories: 32 kcal versus 56 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Prinzessbohnen has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 13 g per 100 g.