Poudre cacaotée bio aux céréales vs Tiger
Overall, Tiger has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Poudre cacaotée bio aux céré... | Tiger |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 373 kcal | 364 kcal |
| Fat | 2.6 g | 4.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.4 g | 2.8 g |
| Sugars | 69 g | 57 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 14 g |
| Protein | 5.8 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Celery, Eggs, Gluten, Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Poudre cacaotée bio aux céréales has 41% less fat (2.6 g vs 4.4 g).
- Poudre cacaotée bio aux céréales has 50% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 2.8 g).
- Tiger has 17% less sugar (57 g vs 69 g).
- Tiger has 100% more fiber (14 g vs 0 g).
- Tiger has 47% more protein (11 g vs 5.8 g).
- Only Poudre cacaotée bio aux céréales lists: Celery, Eggs, Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Poudre cacaotée bio aux céréales
Sucre, cacao maigre en poudre* 21%, céréales* 10% (farine de blé* riz*, avoine*, orge*), sel
Tiger
sucre de canne complet 60%, cacao fortement dégraissé 40%, vanille Bourbon. 100% issu de l'agriculture biologique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Poudre cacaotée bio aux céréales or Tiger?
Overall, Tiger has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tiger has fewer calories: 364 kcal versus 373 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tiger has less sugar: 57 g versus 69 g per 100 g.