Potée auvergnate vs Pork Sausages
Overall, Pork Sausages has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Potée auvergnate | Pork Sausages |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 96 kcal | 79 kcal |
| Fat | 6.1 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 6.9 g | 11.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pork Sausages has 18% fewer calories (79 kcal vs 96 kcal).
- Pork Sausages has 75% less fat (1.5 g vs 6.1 g).
- Pork Sausages has 75% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 2 g).
- Pork Sausages has 67% less sugar (0.4 g vs 1.2 g).
- Pork Sausages has 32% less salt (0.7 g vs 1 g).
- Pork Sausages has 42% more protein (11.8 g vs 6.9 g).
- Pork Sausages has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Potée auvergnate
Not available.
Pork Sausages
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Potée auvergnate or Pork Sausages?
Overall, Pork Sausages has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pork Sausages has fewer calories: 79 kcal versus 96 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pork Sausages has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.