Comparison

Potée auvergnate 420g vs Pork Sausages

Overall, Pork Sausages has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPotée auvergnate 420gPork Sausages
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 73 kcal 79 kcal
Fat 3.7 g 1.5 g
Saturated fat 1.3 g 0.5 g
Sugars 1.2 g 0.4 g
Salt 1 g 0.7 g
Fiber 1.6 g —
Protein 5.7 g 11.8 g
Additives70
AllergensGlutenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pork Sausages has 59% less fat (1.5 g vs 3.7 g).
  • Pork Sausages has 62% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Pork Sausages has 67% less sugar (0.4 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Pork Sausages has 52% more protein (11.8 g vs 5.7 g).
  • Pork Sausages has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Potée auvergnate 420g lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Potée auvergnate 420g

Eau, choux blancs 28%, Saucisses pur porc 13% (viande de porc, eau, pièces de tête de porc, gras et parure de porc, plasma de porc, sel, épices et plantes aromatiques, arômes et arôme de fumée, conservateur : nitrite de sodium, antioxydant : ascorbate de sodium, stabilisants : diphosphates, triphosphates), Viande de porc traitée en salaison 11% (viandede porc, eau, plasma de porc, stabilisants : diphosphates, triphosphates,acidifiants : citrate de sodium, acétate de sodium, sel, conservateur : nitrite de sodium, arômes), haricots blancs trempés 7%, pommes de terre 4,7%, carottes 3,5%, sel, arômes naturels.

Pork Sausages

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Potée auvergnate 420g or Pork Sausages?

Overall, Pork Sausages has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Potée auvergnate 420g has fewer calories: 73 kcal versus 79 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pork Sausages has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons