Comparison
Potato vs Sous Vide matpotet
Overall, Sous Vide matpotet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Potato | Sous Vide matpotet |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 82 kcal | 80 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 1.9 g | 1.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sous Vide matpotet has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Potato has 47% less sugar (0.9 g vs 1.7 g).
- Sous Vide matpotet has 60% more fiber (2 g vs 0.8 g).
Ingredients
Potato
Not available.
Sous Vide matpotet
Potet (100%)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Potato or Sous Vide matpotet?
Overall, Sous Vide matpotet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sous Vide matpotet has fewer calories: 80 kcal versus 82 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Potato has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.