Comparison
Potato vs Middagspoteter
Overall, Middagspoteter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Potato | Middagspoteter |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 82 kcal | 80 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 1.9 g | 1.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Middagspoteter has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Potato has 47% less sugar (0.9 g vs 1.7 g).
- Middagspoteter has 60% more fiber (2 g vs 0.8 g).
Ingredients
Potato
Not available.
Middagspoteter
Poteter uten skall
FAQ
Which is healthier: Potato or Middagspoteter?
Overall, Middagspoteter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Middagspoteter has fewer calories: 80 kcal versus 82 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Potato has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Peeled new potatoes vs Middagspoteter
Peeled new potatoes vs Potato
Maris Piper potatoes vs Middagspoteter
Maris Piper potatoes vs Potato
Quartiers de pommes de t... vs Middagspoteter
Tesco baby potatos with... vs Middagspoteter
Middagspoteter vs Sous Vide matpotet
Baby Potatoes With Chive... vs Middagspoteter