Pork Tenderloin vs Schweinefilet mit Kette
Overall, Pork Tenderloin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Pork Tenderloin
Schweinefilet mit Kette
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pork Tenderloin | Schweinefilet mit Kette |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 119 kcal | 205 kcal |
| Fat | 3 g | 9.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 3.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 21 g | 29.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Lupin, Mustard | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pork Tenderloin has 42% fewer calories (119 kcal vs 205 kcal).
- Pork Tenderloin has 69% less fat (3 g vs 9.8 g).
- Pork Tenderloin has 72% less saturated fat (1 g vs 3.5 g).
- Schweinefilet mit Kette has 28% more protein (29.1 g vs 21 g).
- Pork Tenderloin has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pork Tenderloin lists: Lupin, Mustard.
Ingredients
Pork Tenderloin
Muşchiulet de porc, sare, amestec de condimente. Poate conţine urme de lapte şi produse derivate, muştar, seminţe de susan, fructe cu coajă lemnoasă, lupin, ouă şi ţelină.
Schweinefilet mit Kette
Schweinefleisch.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pork Tenderloin or Schweinefilet mit Kette?
Overall, Pork Tenderloin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pork Tenderloin has fewer calories: 119 kcal versus 205 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Schweinefilet mit Kette has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.