Comparison
Polen granule vs Pollen
Overall, Pollen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Polen granule | Pollen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 372 kcal | 376 kcal |
| Fat | 8.6 g | 5.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.2 g | 2.1 g |
| Sugars | 39.1 g | 40 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 12.6 g | 17.8 g |
| Protein | 20.7 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pollen has 37% less fat (5.4 g vs 8.6 g).
- Pollen has 29% more fiber (17.8 g vs 12.6 g).
- Polen granule has 13% more protein (20.7 g vs 18 g).
Ingredients
Polen granule
Polen granule 100%
Pollen
Polen
FAQ
Which is healthier: Polen granule or Pollen?
Overall, Pollen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Polen granule has fewer calories: 372 kcal versus 376 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Polen granule has less sugar: 39.1 g versus 40 g per 100 g.