Comparison
Polen de flores vs Pollen
Overall, Pollen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Polen de flores | Pollen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 396 kcal | 376 kcal |
| Fat | 6.7 g | 5.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.7 g | 2.1 g |
| Sugars | 38 g | 40 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 9.6 g | 17.8 g |
| Protein | 18 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pollen has 19% less fat (5.4 g vs 6.7 g).
- Pollen has 22% less saturated fat (2.1 g vs 2.7 g).
- Pollen has 46% more fiber (17.8 g vs 9.6 g).
Ingredients
Polen de flores
Not available.
Pollen
Polen
FAQ
Which is healthier: Polen de flores or Pollen?
Overall, Pollen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pollen has fewer calories: 376 kcal versus 396 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Polen de flores has less sugar: 38 g versus 40 g per 100 g.