Pollen de ciste en pelotes vs Polen de flores
Overall, Pollen de ciste en pelotes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pollen de ciste en pelotes | Polen de flores |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 303 kcal | 396 kcal |
| Fat | 6.5 g | 6.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 2.7 g |
| Sugars | 37 g | 38 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 5 g | 9.6 g |
| Protein | 18 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pollen de ciste en pelotes has 23% fewer calories (303 kcal vs 396 kcal).
- Pollen de ciste en pelotes has no saturated fat, while Polen de flores has 2.7 g.
- Polen de flores has 48% more fiber (9.6 g vs 5 g).
Ingredients
Pollen de ciste en pelotes
Pollen de ciste*, récolté en Espagne. *Issu de l'agriculture biologique.
Polen de flores
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pollen de ciste en pelotes or Polen de flores?
Overall, Pollen de ciste en pelotes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pollen de ciste en pelotes has fewer calories: 303 kcal versus 396 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pollen de ciste en pelotes has less sugar: 37 g versus 38 g per 100 g.