Pollen en pelotes vs Pollen de ciste en pelotes
Overall, Pollen de ciste en pelotes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pollen en pelotes | Pollen de ciste en pelotes |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 393 kcal | 303 kcal |
| Fat | 8 g | 6.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 34 g | 37 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 5 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pollen de ciste en pelotes has 23% fewer calories (303 kcal vs 393 kcal).
- Pollen de ciste en pelotes has 19% less fat (6.5 g vs 8 g).
- Pollen de ciste en pelotes has no saturated fat, while Pollen en pelotes has 2 g.
- Pollen de ciste en pelotes has 100% more fiber (5 g vs 0 g).
- Pollen en pelotes has 10% more protein (20 g vs 18 g).
Ingredients
Pollen en pelotes
pollen in balls
Pollen de ciste en pelotes
Pollen de ciste*, récolté en Espagne. *Issu de l'agriculture biologique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pollen en pelotes or Pollen de ciste en pelotes?
Overall, Pollen de ciste en pelotes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pollen de ciste en pelotes has fewer calories: 303 kcal versus 393 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pollen en pelotes has less sugar: 34 g versus 37 g per 100 g.