Comparison
Pollen de fleurs vs Pollen de ciste en pelotes
Overall, Pollen de fleurs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pollen de fleurs | Pollen de ciste en pelotes |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 303 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 6.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 37 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 5 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pollen de fleurs has no calories, while Pollen de ciste en pelotes has 303 kcal.
- Pollen de fleurs has no fat, while Pollen de ciste en pelotes has 6.5 g.
- Pollen de fleurs has no sugar, while Pollen de ciste en pelotes has 37 g.
- Pollen de ciste en pelotes has 100% more fiber (5 g vs 0 g).
- Pollen de ciste en pelotes has 100% more protein (18 g vs 0 g).
- Pollen de fleurs has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Pollen de fleurs
Pollen de fleurs
Pollen de ciste en pelotes
Pollen de ciste*, récolté en Espagne. *Issu de l'agriculture biologique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pollen de fleurs or Pollen de ciste en pelotes?
Overall, Pollen de fleurs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pollen de fleurs has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 303 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pollen de fleurs has less sugar: 0 g versus 37 g per 100 g.