Pollen de ciste en pelotes vs Polen granule
Overall, Pollen de ciste en pelotes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pollen de ciste en pelotes | Polen granule |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 303 kcal | 372 kcal |
| Fat | 6.5 g | 8.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 2.2 g |
| Sugars | 37 g | 39.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 5 g | 12.6 g |
| Protein | 18 g | 20.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pollen de ciste en pelotes has 19% fewer calories (303 kcal vs 372 kcal).
- Pollen de ciste en pelotes has 24% less fat (6.5 g vs 8.6 g).
- Pollen de ciste en pelotes has no saturated fat, while Polen granule has 2.2 g.
- Polen granule has 60% more fiber (12.6 g vs 5 g).
- Polen granule has 13% more protein (20.7 g vs 18 g).
Ingredients
Pollen de ciste en pelotes
Pollen de ciste*, récolté en Espagne. *Issu de l'agriculture biologique.
Polen granule
Polen granule 100%
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pollen de ciste en pelotes or Polen granule?
Overall, Pollen de ciste en pelotes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pollen de ciste en pelotes has fewer calories: 303 kcal versus 372 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pollen de ciste en pelotes has less sugar: 37 g versus 39.1 g per 100 g.