Comparison

Pois chiches HVE Bien cultivés d'aucy 250g vs Pois chiches au sel de Noirmoutier

Overall, Pois chiches au sel de Noirmoutier has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPois chiches HVE Bien cultiv...Pois chiches au sel de Noirm...
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 1 3
Calories 120 kcal 130 kcal
Fat 2.5 g 2.9 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 0 g
Sugars 0.3 g 0.5 g
Salt 0 g 0.4 g
Fiber 5.5 g 7.4 g
Protein 6.7 g 6.6 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pois chiches HVE Bien cultivés d'aucy 250g has 14% less fat (2.5 g vs 2.9 g).
  • Pois chiches au sel de Noirmoutier has no saturated fat, while Pois chiches HVE Bien cultivés d'aucy 250g has 0.3 g.
  • Pois chiches HVE Bien cultivés d'aucy 250g has 97% less salt (0 g vs 0.4 g).
  • Pois chiches au sel de Noirmoutier has 26% more fiber (7.4 g vs 5.5 g).
  • Pois chiches au sel de Noirmoutier has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Pois chiches HVE Bien cultivés d'aucy 250g is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Pois chiches au sel de Noirmoutier lists: None.

Ingredients

Pois chiches HVE Bien cultivés d'aucy 250g

Pois chiches, eau. Ces pois chiches sont cultivés en France.

Pois chiches au sel de Noirmoutier

Pois chiches bio trempés, eau, sel de Noirmoutier (0,34%)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pois chiches HVE Bien cultivés d'aucy 250g or Pois chiches au sel de Noirmoutier?

Overall, Pois chiches au sel de Noirmoutier has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pois chiches HVE Bien cultivés d'aucy 250g has fewer calories: 120 kcal versus 130 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pois chiches HVE Bien cultivés d'aucy 250g has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons