Comparison

Poicamole vs Plant butter

Overall, Poicamole has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPoicamolePlant butter
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 216 kcal 701 kcal
Fat 17 g 79 g
Saturated fat 1.6 g 47 g
Sugars 2.2 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.7 g 0 g
Fiber 5 g —
Protein 5.2 g 0.5 g
Additives02
AllergensSesame seedsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Poicamole has 69% fewer calories (216 kcal vs 701 kcal).
  • Poicamole has 78% less fat (17 g vs 79 g).
  • Poicamole has 97% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 47 g).
  • Plant butter has 77% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Plant butter has no salt, while Poicamole has 0.7 g.
  • Poicamole has 90% more protein (5.2 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Poicamole has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Poicamole is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Poicamole lists: Sesame seeds.

Ingredients

Poicamole

Petit pois* 38 %, huile de colza*, haricot blanc* (origine France) 9,8 %, courge*, jus de citrons*, feuille de coriandre* 7,0 %, pâte de graines de sésame* décortiquées, échalote*, sel, yuzu* entier cueilli à maturité, huile de tournesol*, vinaigre d'alcool*, piment * 0,15% , épices*. * Ingrédient issu de l'agriculture biologique - Certification BIO par ECOCERT FR-BIO-01

Plant butter

plant oils (sustainable palm sunflower rapeseed) filtered water, fava bean preparation, plant-based emulsifier (sunflower lecithin), natural flavourings, unsalted

FAQ

Which is healthier: Poicamole or Plant butter?

Overall, Poicamole has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Poicamole has fewer calories: 216 kcal versus 701 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Plant butter has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons