Pipas grandes supremas vs Kaskaras gigantonas
Overall, Pipas grandes supremas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pipas grandes supremas | Kaskaras gigantonas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 272 kcal | 600 kcal |
| Fat | 22 g | 48 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.9 g | 5.8 g |
| Sugars | 1.7 g | 2.2 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 4 g | — |
| Protein | 14 g | 33 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pipas grandes supremas has 55% fewer calories (272 kcal vs 600 kcal).
- Pipas grandes supremas has 54% less fat (22 g vs 48 g).
- Pipas grandes supremas has 50% less saturated fat (2.9 g vs 5.8 g).
- Pipas grandes supremas has 22% less sugar (1.7 g vs 2.2 g).
- Kaskaras gigantonas has 89% less salt (0.2 g vs 2 g).
- Kaskaras gigantonas has 58% more protein (33 g vs 14 g).
- Pipas grandes supremas has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Pipas grandes supremas
Not available.
Kaskaras gigantonas
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pipas grandes supremas or Kaskaras gigantonas?
Overall, Pipas grandes supremas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pipas grandes supremas has fewer calories: 272 kcal versus 600 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pipas grandes supremas has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.