Comparison
Pinienkerne vs Pinienkerne
Overall, Pinienkerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pinienkerne | Pinienkerne |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 698 kcal | 596 kcal |
| Fat | 64 g | 50.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.5 g | 1.3 g |
| Sugars | 4.4 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 7.2 g | 7.2 g |
| Protein | 18 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pinienkerne has 15% fewer calories (596 kcal vs 698 kcal).
- Pinienkerne has 21% less fat (50.8 g vs 64 g).
- Pinienkerne has 80% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 6.5 g).
- Pinienkerne has 80% less sugar (0.9 g vs 4.4 g).
- Pinienkerne has 25% more protein (24 g vs 18 g).
Ingredients
Pinienkerne
Pinienkerne.
Pinienkerne
Pinienkerne
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pinienkerne or Pinienkerne?
Overall, Pinienkerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pinienkerne has fewer calories: 596 kcal versus 698 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pinienkerne has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 4.4 g per 100 g.