Comparison

Pignons de pin vs Pignon de Pin Bio Siberie

Overall, Pignons de pin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPignons de pinPignon de Pin Bio Siberie
Nutri-Score a —
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 686 kcal 695 kcal
Fat 65 g 65 g
Saturated fat 4.7 g 5.5 g
Sugars 3.6 g 5.2 g
Salt 0 g —
Fiber 10 g 0 g
Protein 14 g 16.2 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pignons de pin has 15% less saturated fat (4.7 g vs 5.5 g).
  • Pignons de pin has 31% less sugar (3.6 g vs 5.2 g).
  • Pignons de pin has 100% more fiber (10 g vs 0 g).
  • Pignon de Pin Bio Siberie has 14% more protein (16.2 g vs 14 g).

Ingredients

Pignons de pin

Pignon de pin

Pignon de Pin Bio Siberie

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pignons de pin or Pignon de Pin Bio Siberie?

Overall, Pignons de pin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pignons de pin has fewer calories: 686 kcal versus 695 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pignons de pin has less sugar: 3.6 g versus 5.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons