Pignons de pin vs Pignon de Pin Bio Siberie
Overall, Pignons de pin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pignons de pin | Pignon de Pin Bio Siberie |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 686 kcal | 695 kcal |
| Fat | 65 g | 65 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.7 g | 5.5 g |
| Sugars | 3.6 g | 5.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Fiber | 10 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 16.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pignons de pin has 15% less saturated fat (4.7 g vs 5.5 g).
- Pignons de pin has 31% less sugar (3.6 g vs 5.2 g).
- Pignons de pin has 100% more fiber (10 g vs 0 g).
- Pignon de Pin Bio Siberie has 14% more protein (16.2 g vs 14 g).
Ingredients
Pignons de pin
Pignon de pin
Pignon de Pin Bio Siberie
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pignons de pin or Pignon de Pin Bio Siberie?
Overall, Pignons de pin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pignons de pin has fewer calories: 686 kcal versus 695 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pignons de pin has less sugar: 3.6 g versus 5.2 g per 100 g.