Pignons de pin vs Pinoli siberiani sgusciati
Overall, Pignons de pin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pignons de pin | Pinoli siberiani sgusciati |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 686 kcal | 676 kcal |
| Fat | 65 g | 64 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.7 g | 7.2 g |
| Sugars | 3.6 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Fiber | 10 g | 7 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pignons de pin has 35% less saturated fat (4.7 g vs 7.2 g).
- Pinoli siberiani sgusciati has 53% less sugar (1.7 g vs 3.6 g).
- Pignons de pin has 30% more fiber (10 g vs 7 g).
Ingredients
Pignons de pin
Pignon de pin
Pinoli siberiani sgusciati
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pignons de pin or Pinoli siberiani sgusciati?
Overall, Pignons de pin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pinoli siberiani sgusciati has fewer calories: 676 kcal versus 686 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pinoli siberiani sgusciati has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.