Comparison
Physalis seches vs Physalis getrocknet
Overall, Physalis getrocknet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Physalis seches | Physalis getrocknet |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 403 kcal | 300 kcal |
| Fat | 8.1 g | 4.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.8 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 30.4 g | 38.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 24.4 g | 24.3 g |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 6.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Physalis getrocknet has 26% fewer calories (300 kcal vs 403 kcal).
- Physalis getrocknet has 42% less fat (4.7 g vs 8.1 g).
- Physalis getrocknet has 67% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 1.8 g).
- Physalis seches has 21% less sugar (30.4 g vs 38.5 g).
Ingredients
Physalis seches
Not available.
Physalis getrocknet
Physalis, getrocknet
FAQ
Which is healthier: Physalis seches or Physalis getrocknet?
Overall, Physalis getrocknet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Physalis getrocknet has fewer calories: 300 kcal versus 403 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Physalis seches has less sugar: 30.4 g versus 38.5 g per 100 g.