Comparison
Petitcorse vs Boles de picolat
Overall, Boles de picolat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Petitcorse | Boles de picolat |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 405 kcal | 230 kcal |
| Fat | 34 g | 17.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 24 g | 6.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 24 g | 9.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Boles de picolat has 43% fewer calories (230 kcal vs 405 kcal).
- Boles de picolat has 47% less fat (17.9 g vs 34 g).
- Boles de picolat has 72% less saturated fat (6.7 g vs 24 g).
- Petitcorse has 44% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Boles de picolat has 40% less salt (1.1 g vs 1.8 g).
- Petitcorse has 60% more protein (24 g vs 9.6 g).
- Boles de picolat has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Petitcorse lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Petitcorse
Lait de brebis entier pasteurisé origine France, sel, présure, ferments
Boles de picolat
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Petitcorse or Boles de picolat?
Overall, Boles de picolat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Boles de picolat has fewer calories: 230 kcal versus 405 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Petitcorse has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.