Comparison
Casamacaise vs Boles de picolat
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Casamacaise | Boles de picolat |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 390 kcal | 230 kcal |
| Fat | 3.7 g | 17.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.2 g | 6.7 g |
| Sugars | 4.9 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | — |
| Protein | 73.2 g | 9.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Boles de picolat has 41% fewer calories (230 kcal vs 390 kcal).
- Casamacaise has 80% less fat (3.7 g vs 17.9 g).
- Casamacaise has 82% less saturated fat (1.2 g vs 6.7 g).
- Boles de picolat has 82% less sugar (0.9 g vs 4.9 g).
- Boles de picolat has 29% less salt (1.1 g vs 1.5 g).
- Casamacaise has 87% more protein (73.2 g vs 9.6 g).
Ingredients
Casamacaise
Not available.
Boles de picolat
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Casamacaise or Boles de picolat?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Boles de picolat has fewer calories: 230 kcal versus 390 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Boles de picolat has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 4.9 g per 100 g.