Comparison
Perail vs Geitenkaas Gerijpt
Overall, Geitenkaas Gerijpt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Perail | Geitenkaas Gerijpt |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 307 kcal | 273 kcal |
| Fat | 27 g | 23 g |
| Saturated fat | 20 g | 17 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 1.6 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 16 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Geitenkaas Gerijpt has 11% fewer calories (273 kcal vs 307 kcal).
- Geitenkaas Gerijpt has 15% less fat (23 g vs 27 g).
- Geitenkaas Gerijpt has 15% less saturated fat (17 g vs 20 g).
- Perail has 69% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.6 g).
- Geitenkaas Gerijpt has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Perail lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Perail
gepasteuriseerde schapenmelk
Geitenkaas Gerijpt
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Perail or Geitenkaas Gerijpt?
Overall, Geitenkaas Gerijpt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Geitenkaas Gerijpt has fewer calories: 273 kcal versus 307 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Perail has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.