Comparison

Pechuga de Pavo Cocida Bajo Contenido el Sal vs Trutenbrust hauchdünn

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPechuga de Pavo Cocida Bajo...Trutenbrust hauchdünn
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 107 kcal 63 kcal
Fat 1.1 g 1 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 0.3 g
Sugars 1 g 0.5 g
Salt 1.3 g 2.2 g
Fiber 0 g 0.5 g
Protein 23 g 21 g
Additives54
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Trutenbrust hauchdünn has 41% fewer calories (63 kcal vs 107 kcal).
  • Trutenbrust hauchdünn has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
  • Pechuga de Pavo Cocida Bajo Contenido el Sal has 41% less salt (1.3 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Trutenbrust hauchdünn has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Pechuga de Pavo Cocida Bajo Contenido el Sal has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Pechuga de Pavo Cocida Bajo Contenido el Sal

Pechuga de pavo (93%), sal, jarabe de glucosa, gelificante (E407), azúcar, estabilizante (E451), sal potásica, aroma, fibra vegetal, antioxidante (E301), conservador (E243,E250), extractos de especias.

Trutenbrust hauchdünn

Trutenfleisch (Brasilien, Frankreich, Ungarn, Polen) 90%, Wasser, Nitrit. pokelsalz (jodiertes Kochsalz, Konservierungsstoff: E 250), Würze (enthalt Hefe extrakt), Glucosesirup, Antioxidationsmittel: E 301 und 591, Saureregulator 500, Stabilisatoren: E 450 und E 451, Verdickungsmittel: Johannisbrotkernmeti und E 4078.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pechuga de Pavo Cocida Bajo Contenido el Sal or Trutenbrust hauchdünn?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Trutenbrust hauchdünn has fewer calories: 63 kcal versus 107 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Trutenbrust hauchdünn has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons