Comparison

Pechuga de Pavo Cocida Bajo Contenido el Sal vs Lomo de Pavo

Overall, Pechuga de Pavo Cocida Bajo Contenido el Sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPechuga de Pavo Cocida Bajo...Lomo de Pavo
Nutri-Score a e
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 107 kcal 172 kcal
Fat 1.1 g 5.8 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 2.8 g
Sugars 1 g 0.7 g
Salt 1.3 g 3.8 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 23 g 40 g
Additives50
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pechuga de Pavo Cocida Bajo Contenido el Sal has 38% fewer calories (107 kcal vs 172 kcal).
  • Pechuga de Pavo Cocida Bajo Contenido el Sal has 81% less fat (1.1 g vs 5.8 g).
  • Pechuga de Pavo Cocida Bajo Contenido el Sal has 86% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Lomo de Pavo has 30% less sugar (0.7 g vs 1 g).
  • Pechuga de Pavo Cocida Bajo Contenido el Sal has 66% less salt (1.3 g vs 3.8 g).
  • Lomo de Pavo has 43% more protein (40 g vs 23 g).
  • Pechuga de Pavo Cocida Bajo Contenido el Sal has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Pechuga de Pavo Cocida Bajo Contenido el Sal

Pechuga de pavo (93%), sal, jarabe de glucosa, gelificante (E407), azúcar, estabilizante (E451), sal potásica, aroma, fibra vegetal, antioxidante (E301), conservador (E243,E250), extractos de especias.

Lomo de Pavo

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pechuga de Pavo Cocida Bajo Contenido el Sal or Lomo de Pavo?

Overall, Pechuga de Pavo Cocida Bajo Contenido el Sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pechuga de Pavo Cocida Bajo Contenido el Sal has fewer calories: 107 kcal versus 172 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Lomo de Pavo has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons