Pates alimentaires de mais vs Ditali rigati mais e riso
Overall, Pates alimentaires de mais has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pates alimentaires de mais | Ditali rigati mais e riso |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 345 kcal | 361 kcal |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 2.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g |
| Protein | 5.5 g | 6.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pates alimentaires de mais has 65% less fat (0.8 g vs 2.3 g).
- Pates alimentaires de mais has no saturated fat, while Ditali rigati mais e riso has 1.1 g.
- Ditali rigati mais e riso has 100% more fiber (3.3 g vs 0 g).
- Ditali rigati mais e riso has 13% more protein (6.3 g vs 5.5 g).
- Pates alimentaires de mais has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Pates alimentaires de mais
farine de maïs
Ditali rigati mais e riso
Farina di Mais 89,5%, farina di Riso integrale 10%, emulsionante: mono - e digliceridi degli acidi grassi.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pates alimentaires de mais or Ditali rigati mais e riso?
Overall, Pates alimentaires de mais has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pates alimentaires de mais has fewer calories: 345 kcal versus 361 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pates alimentaires de mais has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.