Comparison

Goodel Rote Linsen Mit Leinsamen vs Pates alimentaires de mais

Overall, Goodel Rote Linsen Mit Leinsamen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientGoodel Rote Linsen Mit Leins...Pates alimentaires de mais
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 313 kcal 345 kcal
Fat 2 g 0.8 g
Saturated fat 0.6 g 0 g
Sugars 1.4 g 0 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 6.8 g 0 g
Protein 23 g 5.5 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pates alimentaires de mais has 60% less fat (0.8 g vs 2 g).
  • Pates alimentaires de mais has no saturated fat, while Goodel Rote Linsen Mit Leinsamen has 0.6 g.
  • Pates alimentaires de mais has no sugar, while Goodel Rote Linsen Mit Leinsamen has 1.4 g.
  • Goodel Rote Linsen Mit Leinsamen has 100% more fiber (6.8 g vs 0 g).
  • Goodel Rote Linsen Mit Leinsamen has 76% more protein (23 g vs 5.5 g).
  • Goodel Rote Linsen Mit Leinsamen has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Goodel Rote Linsen Mit Leinsamen

97% Rote Linsen, gemahlen, 3% Leinsamen

Pates alimentaires de mais

farine de maïs

FAQ

Which is healthier: Goodel Rote Linsen Mit Leinsamen or Pates alimentaires de mais?

Overall, Goodel Rote Linsen Mit Leinsamen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Goodel Rote Linsen Mit Leinsamen has fewer calories: 313 kcal versus 345 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pates alimentaires de mais has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons