Goodel Rote Linsen Mit Leinsamen vs Pates alimentaires de mais
Overall, Goodel Rote Linsen Mit Leinsamen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Goodel Rote Linsen Mit Leinsamen
Pates alimentaires de mais
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Goodel Rote Linsen Mit Leins... | Pates alimentaires de mais |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 313 kcal | 345 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 6.8 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 23 g | 5.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pates alimentaires de mais has 60% less fat (0.8 g vs 2 g).
- Pates alimentaires de mais has no saturated fat, while Goodel Rote Linsen Mit Leinsamen has 0.6 g.
- Pates alimentaires de mais has no sugar, while Goodel Rote Linsen Mit Leinsamen has 1.4 g.
- Goodel Rote Linsen Mit Leinsamen has 100% more fiber (6.8 g vs 0 g).
- Goodel Rote Linsen Mit Leinsamen has 76% more protein (23 g vs 5.5 g).
- Goodel Rote Linsen Mit Leinsamen has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Goodel Rote Linsen Mit Leinsamen
97% Rote Linsen, gemahlen, 3% Leinsamen
Pates alimentaires de mais
farine de maïs
FAQ
Which is healthier: Goodel Rote Linsen Mit Leinsamen or Pates alimentaires de mais?
Overall, Goodel Rote Linsen Mit Leinsamen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Goodel Rote Linsen Mit Leinsamen has fewer calories: 313 kcal versus 345 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pates alimentaires de mais has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.