Comparison

Pâté campagne breton IGP vs Pâté de Campagne Breton Label Rouge IGP

Overall, Pâté campagne breton IGP has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPâté campagne breton IGPPâté de Campagne Breton Labe...
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 307 kcal 351 kcal
Fat 26 g 32 g
Saturated fat 9.3 g 12 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.5 g
Salt 1.2 g 1.7 g
Fiber 0.5 g 0.3 g
Protein 15 g 13 g
Additives00
AllergensEggs, GlutenEggs

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pâté campagne breton IGP has 13% fewer calories (307 kcal vs 351 kcal).
  • Pâté campagne breton IGP has 19% less fat (26 g vs 32 g).
  • Pâté campagne breton IGP has 22% less saturated fat (9.3 g vs 12 g).
  • Pâté campagne breton IGP has 29% less salt (1.2 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Pâté campagne breton IGP has 13% more protein (15 g vs 13 g).
  • Pâté campagne breton IGP has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Pâté campagne breton IGP lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Pâté campagne breton IGP

gorge de porc*, foie de porc*, oignons, couenne de porc*, œufs, farine de blé, sel, poivre, ail. Traces éventuelles de moutarde, de lait et de céleri.

Pâté de Campagne Breton Label Rouge IGP

Gorge de porc*, foie de porc*, gras de porc*, Couenne de porc*, oignons frais, blanc d'œuf frais, sel, fécule de pomme de terre, poivre, ail. *Issus de porc label rouge origine France.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pâté campagne breton IGP or Pâté de Campagne Breton Label Rouge IGP?

Overall, Pâté campagne breton IGP has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pâté campagne breton IGP has fewer calories: 307 kcal versus 351 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pâté campagne breton IGP has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons