Comparison

Patatas bravas vs Gajo Rústico

Overall, Patatas bravas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPatatas bravasGajo Rústico
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group — 4
Calories 111 kcal 150 kcal
Fat 1.7 g 6.1 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0.7 g
Sugars 0.5 g 1 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.8 g
Fiber 2.6 g 2.3 g
Protein 2.7 g 2.5 g
Additives02
AllergensNone listedGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Patatas bravas has 26% fewer calories (111 kcal vs 150 kcal).
  • Patatas bravas has 72% less fat (1.7 g vs 6.1 g).
  • Patatas bravas has 71% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Patatas bravas has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
  • Patatas bravas has 94% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Patatas bravas has 12% more fiber (2.6 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Patatas bravas has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Gajo Rústico lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Patatas bravas

Um cozimento ideal, McCain recomenda o uso de uma Para una cocción óptima, Airfryer Philips./Per una cottura ottimale, McCain consiglia di utilizzare un Airfryer Philips. FRITEUSE/FREIDORA/FRITADEIRA/FRIGGITRICE 2²² 175°C FR Pour optimiser la qualité de ce produit, nous vous recommandons de respecter le

Gajo Rústico

potato 86%, 8% coverage (wheat flour, salt, modified potato starch, spices (black pepper, chili, cayenne pepper), garlic powder, onion powder, gasifiers (e450, e500), yeast extract, spice extracts (black pepper), dextrose), sunflower oil 6%,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Patatas bravas or Gajo Rústico?

Overall, Patatas bravas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Patatas bravas has fewer calories: 111 kcal versus 150 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Patatas bravas has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons