Comparison

Gajo Rústico vs Grosses chips

Overall, Grosses chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientGajo RústicoGrosses chips
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 150 kcal 160 kcal
Fat 6.1 g 5.5 g
Saturated fat 0.7 g 0.6 g
Sugars 1 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.8 g 0.4 g
Fiber 2.3 g 3 g
Protein 2.5 g 2.5 g
Additives25
AllergensGlutenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Grosses chips has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
  • Grosses chips has 49% less salt (0.4 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Grosses chips has 23% more fiber (3 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Grosses chips has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Gajo Rústico lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Gajo Rústico

potato 86%, 8% coverage (wheat flour, salt, modified potato starch, spices (black pepper, chili, cayenne pepper), garlic powder, onion powder, gasifiers (e450, e500), yeast extract, spice extracts (black pepper), dextrose), sunflower oil 6%,

Grosses chips

Pommes de terre (89,1%), huile de tournesol (5,5%), enrobage (5%) [amidon modifié de pommes de terre, farine de riz, dextrine, fibre de pois, épaississant: gomme xanthane, extrait de curcuma, protéine de pois, colorant: extrait de paprika], sel (0,4%). Contient du pois.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Gajo Rústico or Grosses chips?

Overall, Grosses chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Gajo Rústico has fewer calories: 150 kcal versus 160 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Grosses chips has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons