Comparison

Pastilles honing vs Classic

Overall, Classic has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Pastilles honing

Pastilles honing

Diele · 75 g
e NOVA 3
Better choice
Classic

Classic

Anta
e

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPastilles honingClassic
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 385 kcal 384 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 0 g
Sugars 73 g 68 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 0 g 0 g
Additives00
AllergensMilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Classic has no fat, while Pastilles honing has 0.5 g.
  • Classic has no saturated fat, while Pastilles honing has 0.3 g.
  • Only Pastilles honing lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Pastilles honing

milk

Classic

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pastilles honing or Classic?

Overall, Classic has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Classic has fewer calories: 384 kcal versus 385 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Classic has less sugar: 68 g versus 73 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Pastilles honing vs Eucalyptus Pastilles honing vs Honing citroensmaak past... Pastilles honing vs Menthol keelpastilles Pastilles honing vs Balsamica polar relief p... Honing citroensmaak past... vs Classic Menthol keelpastilles vs Classic Balsamica polar relief p... vs Classic Menthol eucalyptus vs Classic