Honing citroensmaak pastilles vs Classic
Overall, Honing citroensmaak pastilles has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Honing citroensmaak pastille... | Classic |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 386 kcal | 384 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 68 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 5 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Honing citroensmaak pastilles has 100% less sugar (0.3 g vs 68 g).
- Honing citroensmaak pastilles has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Honing citroensmaak pastilles
Zoetstof: sorbitolen; water, verdikkingsmiddel: Arabische gom; voedingszuren: melkzuur, citroenzuur, natriumlactaat; Vitamine C, natuurlijk honingaroma, natuurlijk citroenaroma met andere natuurlijke aroma's, gekaramelliseerde suiker. Kan sporen van glutenbevattende granen (gerst) bevatten.
Classic
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Honing citroensmaak pastilles or Classic?
Overall, Honing citroensmaak pastilles has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Classic has fewer calories: 384 kcal versus 386 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Honing citroensmaak pastilles has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 68 g per 100 g.