Menthol keelpastilles vs Classic
Overall, Menthol keelpastilles has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Menthol keelpastilles | Classic |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 389 kcal | 384 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 68 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | — |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Menthol keelpastilles has 100% less sugar (0.3 g vs 68 g).
- Menthol keelpastilles has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Menthol keelpastilles
Zoetstof: sorbitol, verdikkingsmiddel: arabische gom, water, voedingszuur: E300, menthol, plantenconcentraten (spirulina, saffloer), natuurlijk aroma, natuurlijk eucalyptusaroma
Classic
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Menthol keelpastilles or Classic?
Overall, Menthol keelpastilles has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Classic has fewer calories: 384 kcal versus 389 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Menthol keelpastilles has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 68 g per 100 g.