Pastilles honing vs Menthol keelpastilles
Overall, Menthol keelpastilles has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pastilles honing | Menthol keelpastilles |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 385 kcal | 389 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 73 g | 0.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.9 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Menthol keelpastilles has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Menthol keelpastilles has 100% less sugar (0.3 g vs 73 g).
- Menthol keelpastilles has 100% more fiber (1.9 g vs 0 g).
- Menthol keelpastilles has the better Nutri-Score.
- Pastilles honing is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Pastilles honing lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Pastilles honing
milk
Menthol keelpastilles
Zoetstof: sorbitol, verdikkingsmiddel: arabische gom, water, voedingszuur: E300, menthol, plantenconcentraten (spirulina, saffloer), natuurlijk aroma, natuurlijk eucalyptusaroma
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pastilles honing or Menthol keelpastilles?
Overall, Menthol keelpastilles has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pastilles honing has fewer calories: 385 kcal versus 389 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Menthol keelpastilles has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 73 g per 100 g.