Balsamica polar relief pastilles vs Menthol keelpastilles
Overall, Menthol keelpastilles has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Balsamica polar relief pasti... | Menthol keelpastilles |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 390 kcal | 389 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 97 g | 0.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.9 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Additives | 3 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Menthol keelpastilles has 100% less sugar (0.3 g vs 97 g).
- Menthol keelpastilles has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Balsamica polar relief pastilles
Sugar. Thickening agents: Arabic gum, tragacanth, Romectant glycerin. Liquorice eucalyptus, menthol, Tolu balm, flavours.
Menthol keelpastilles
Zoetstof: sorbitol, verdikkingsmiddel: arabische gom, water, voedingszuur: E300, menthol, plantenconcentraten (spirulina, saffloer), natuurlijk aroma, natuurlijk eucalyptusaroma
FAQ
Which is healthier: Balsamica polar relief pastilles or Menthol keelpastilles?
Overall, Menthol keelpastilles has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Menthol keelpastilles has fewer calories: 389 kcal versus 390 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Menthol keelpastilles has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 97 g per 100 g.