Eucalyptus vs Balsamica polar relief pastilles
Overall, Eucalyptus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Eucalyptus | Balsamica polar relief pasti... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 396 kcal | 390 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 97 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 3 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Eucalyptus has no sugar, while Balsamica polar relief pastilles has 97 g.
- Eucalyptus has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Eucalyptus
Zoetstoffen (isomalt, xylitol, acesulfaam K), menthol (0,3 %), eucalyptusolie (0,15 %).
Balsamica polar relief pastilles
Sugar. Thickening agents: Arabic gum, tragacanth, Romectant glycerin. Liquorice eucalyptus, menthol, Tolu balm, flavours.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Eucalyptus or Balsamica polar relief pastilles?
Overall, Eucalyptus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Balsamica polar relief pastilles has fewer calories: 390 kcal versus 396 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Eucalyptus has less sugar: 0 g versus 97 g per 100 g.