Balsamica polar relief pastilles vs Menthol eucalyptus
Overall, Menthol eucalyptus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Balsamica polar relief pasti... | Menthol eucalyptus |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 390 kcal | 387 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 97 g | 69 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Menthol eucalyptus has 29% less sugar (69 g vs 97 g).
Ingredients
Balsamica polar relief pastilles
Sugar. Thickening agents: Arabic gum, tragacanth, Romectant glycerin. Liquorice eucalyptus, menthol, Tolu balm, flavours.
Menthol eucalyptus
Suiker, glucosestroop, natuurlijk eucalyptus menthol aroma.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Balsamica polar relief pastilles or Menthol eucalyptus?
Overall, Menthol eucalyptus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Menthol eucalyptus has fewer calories: 387 kcal versus 390 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Menthol eucalyptus has less sugar: 69 g versus 97 g per 100 g.