Comparison
Menthol eucalyptus vs Classic
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Menthol eucalyptus | Classic |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 387 kcal | 384 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 69 g | 68 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Ingredients
Menthol eucalyptus
Suiker, glucosestroop, natuurlijk eucalyptus menthol aroma.
Classic
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Menthol eucalyptus or Classic?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Classic has fewer calories: 384 kcal versus 387 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Classic has less sugar: 68 g versus 69 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Pastilles honing vs Classic
Honing citroensmaak past... vs Menthol eucalyptus
Honing citroensmaak past... vs Classic
Menthol keelpastilles vs Menthol eucalyptus
Menthol keelpastilles vs Classic
Balsamica polar relief p... vs Menthol eucalyptus
Balsamica polar relief p... vs Classic
Eucalyptus vs Menthol eucalyptus